# Clip list

Six vertical clips cut from the latest official Redbelly Insights episodes ([redbelly.network/ama](https://redbelly.network/ama)). Timestamps are `mm:ss` in the official episode file. Where a clip has more than one range, the ranges are joined with a straight cut; only restatements or asides were removed, never words that change the point being made.

| # | Clip | Source episode | Timestamps | Speaker | Length |
|---|------|----------------|------------|---------|--------|
| 1 | [01-audd-sovereignty](clips/01-audd-sovereignty.mp4) | Redbelly Insights - Episode 29 (9 July 2026) | 43:03-43:11, 43:21-43:29, 43:40-43:50, 44:06-44:29 | Effie Dimitropoulos, CEO, AUDD Stablecoin | 48 s |
| 2 | [02-tokenised-workflows](clips/02-tokenised-workflows.mp4) | Redbelly Insights - Episode 28 (11 June 2026) | 05:40-06:10, 06:29-06:41 | Vincent Gramoli, Founder, Redbelly Network | 43 s |
| 3 | [03-accountable-consensus](clips/03-accountable-consensus.mp4) | Redbelly Insights - Episode 28 (11 June 2026) | 11:49-11:56, 12:16-12:41, 12:42-12:58, 13:02-13:10 | Vincent Gramoli, Founder, Redbelly Network | 57 s |
| 4 | [04-ai-agent-accountability](clips/04-ai-agent-accountability.mp4) | Redbelly Insights - Episode 28 (11 June 2026) | 17:05-17:27, 17:35-17:56, 18:09-18:24 | Vincent Gramoli, Founder, Redbelly Network | 59 s |
| 5 | [05-tokeniser-gateway](clips/05-tokeniser-gateway.mp4) | Redbelly Insights - Episode 26 (26 March 2026) | 07:10-07:28, 07:34-08:13 | Matt Mills, Tokeniser (formerly Liquidise) | 56 s |
| 6 | [06-acacia-instant-subscription](clips/06-acacia-instant-subscription.mp4) | Redbelly Insights - Episode 26 (26 March 2026) | 19:52-20:16, 20:29-20:57 | Matt Mills, Tokeniser (formerly Liquidise) | 53 s |

## 1. Why an Aussie dollar stablecoin runs on Redbelly

- **File:** [`clips/01-audd-sovereignty.mp4`](clips/01-audd-sovereignty.mp4) (subtitles also as [`subtitles/01-audd-sovereignty.srt`](subtitles/01-audd-sovereignty.srt))
- **Source:** Redbelly Insights - Episode 29, 9 July 2026, [official episode file](https://storage.googleapis.com/redbelly-website.firebasestorage.app/Video/rb_ep_29_final_fde9f2a3d6/rb_ep_29_final_fde9f2a3d6.mp4)
- **Timestamps:** 43:03-43:11, 43:21-43:29, 43:40-43:50, 44:06-44:29
- **Speaker:** Effie Dimitropoulos, CEO, AUDD Stablecoin
- **Topic:** Redbelly technology (Australian-built chain for a sovereign AUD stablecoin)
- **Suggested post caption:** Every US dollar stablecoin is money that isn't sitting onshore. AUDD's Effie Dimitropoulos on why an Aussie dollar stablecoin chose Australian-built, Australian-operated Redbelly.

> We're on Redbelly for that exact reason. Well, two reasons, you know, I touched on one of them, which is the sovereignty, right? When you or I don't naturally hold and spend US dollars in our day-to-day lives and in our wallets, we generally tend to operate in our Australian dollars, then why are we pushed in the digital asset space of dealing with US dollars, right? However, it all then boils down to every time you're using a US dollar, that is, and especially a US dollar stablecoin, it's money that's not sitting onshore. It's money that's not backing your asset onshore. And so supporting the Australian ecosystem by using a blockchain like Redbelly that is an Australian-built and Australian-operated blockchain is pretty important.

## 2. A tokenised invoice is just a PDF. The workflow is the value.

- **File:** [`clips/02-tokenised-workflows.mp4`](clips/02-tokenised-workflows.mp4) (subtitles also as [`subtitles/02-tokenised-workflows.srt`](subtitles/02-tokenised-workflows.srt))
- **Source:** Redbelly Insights - Episode 28, 11 June 2026, [official episode file](https://storage.googleapis.com/redbelly-website.firebasestorage.app/Video/rb_ep_28_final_745719acdb/rb_ep_28_final_745719acdb.mp4)
- **Timestamps:** 05:40-06:10, 06:29-06:41
- **Speaker:** Vincent Gramoli, Founder, Redbelly Network
- **Topic:** Project Acacia / Redbelly technology (tokenised workflows)
- **Suggested post caption:** A tokenised invoice on its own is just a PDF in token form. Vincent Gramoli on why the value is in the workflow: a promise of payment you can use as collateral, as tested in Project Acacia.

> There is limited use in the tokenised assets, right? If you don't have the tokenised workflows around it, right? So if you think about, like, I remember some of the use cases we've done with Project Acacia and Arturo, which was about, you know, tokenising invoices, for example. So if you think about an invoice that is tokenised, okay, that's what, a PDF document that has been digitalised into a token? What's the value out of it? The value comes from the promise of a payment. An invoice is a promise of a payment, right? And that's really what is interesting here, because now you can use this invoice as a promise of payment as a collateral, maybe, you know, and you can borrow money. And this whole workflow is much more valuable than the digital representation of the invoice itself.

## 3. Try to double-spend and you get caught

- **File:** [`clips/03-accountable-consensus.mp4`](clips/03-accountable-consensus.mp4) (subtitles also as [`subtitles/03-accountable-consensus.srt`](subtitles/03-accountable-consensus.srt))
- **Source:** Redbelly Insights - Episode 28, 11 June 2026, [official episode file](https://storage.googleapis.com/redbelly-website.firebasestorage.app/Video/rb_ep_28_final_745719acdb/rb_ep_28_final_745719acdb.mp4)
- **Timestamps:** 11:49-11:56, 12:16-12:41, 12:42-12:58, 13:02-13:10
- **Speaker:** Vincent Gramoli, Founder, Redbelly Network
- **Topic:** Redbelly technology (accountable consensus)
- **Suggested post caption:** You can try to double-spend, but you'll get caught, with undeniable proof of fraud. Vincent Gramoli explains accountable consensus.

> The consensus is central to blockchain, right? So making sure that there's a unique block at the given index prevents you from having double-spending. What we did back in 2019 was to define an accountable consensus version, which means that, okay, if you cannot solve consensus, which means that you probably have hackers among the participants that are trying to double-spend, and that's how you couldn't solve consensus, then what you can do if you truly solve the accountable consensus problem is that you can identify who they are. And so suddenly you make everyone accountable in the sense that, okay, you can cheat if you want, you can try to double-spend, but you're gonna get caught. And there is no way around. There's gonna be an undeniable proof of fraud that will be generated and everyone will see that you're responsible. If you know that, you're going to think twice before cheating because there is a risk that you cannot even double-spend, but for sure you're going to get caught.

## 4. Every AI agent needs a human who answers for it

- **File:** [`clips/04-ai-agent-accountability.mp4`](clips/04-ai-agent-accountability.mp4) (subtitles also as [`subtitles/04-ai-agent-accountability.srt`](subtitles/04-ai-agent-accountability.srt))
- **Source:** Redbelly Insights - Episode 28, 11 June 2026, [official episode file](https://storage.googleapis.com/redbelly-website.firebasestorage.app/Video/rb_ep_28_final_745719acdb/rb_ep_28_final_745719acdb.mp4)
- **Timestamps:** 17:05-17:27, 17:35-17:56, 18:09-18:24
- **Speaker:** Vincent Gramoli, Founder, Redbelly Network
- **Topic:** Redbelly technology (application-layer accountability)
- **Suggested post caption:** AI agents are welcome, but someone has to answer for them. Vincent Gramoli on linking every Redbelly account to a real person or institution.

> There is yet another layer at the application level that consists of making sure that, for example, every account is linked to a human or an institution, as opposed to an AI agent. And I think it's very important. I'm not saying that Redbelly doesn't welcome AI agents. Of course, we're using that. But what I'm saying is that if there is an AI agent that is acting, he acts on the behalf of someone else, right? And by doing that, it should make sure that there is this person or institutions that acts, that should be responsible for its AI agent, right? So there is no full autonomy of the AI agent. And by having Redbelly Network associating an account to these kind of human or institutions that exist in the real world will guarantee that the AI agent who does something wrong will have a responsible party in the real world.

## 5. Everyone wants tokenisation. Tokeniser is the how.

- **File:** [`clips/05-tokeniser-gateway.mp4`](clips/05-tokeniser-gateway.mp4) (subtitles also as [`subtitles/05-tokeniser-gateway.srt`](subtitles/05-tokeniser-gateway.srt))
- **Source:** Redbelly Insights - Episode 26, 26 March 2026, [official episode file](https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/redbelly-website.firebasestorage.app/o/RBI_EP26.mp4?alt=media&token=ce10a8dd-1721-4272-bd43-f3e6be081d94)
- **Timestamps:** 07:10-07:28, 07:34-08:13
- **Speaker:** Matt Mills, Tokeniser (formerly Liquidise)
- **Topic:** Tokeniser
- **Suggested post caption:** Everyone wants tokenisation. The question has always been how. Matt Mills on Tokeniser: a familiar platform that brings issuers and investors onto Redbelly Network.

> We've always known that tokenisation is the future. Real-world asset tokenisation has been a very hot topic. It's been something a lot of people want to do, but the question has always been, how do we do this? And that's very much why Tokeniser exists. It's meant to be that gateway, that ability for those issuers. We want to give them a platform that's familiar, easy to use, that very much traditional in this sense, Web 2.0 style interface, but at the same time is powered by and enables them to essentially tokenise their assets. So it makes it easy for the issuers to essentially get onto the Redbelly Network. It makes it easy for their shareholders, note holders, unit holders, whoever has invested in these issuers to get onto the Redbelly Network and makes it easy for those tokens that have been minted and issued via the Tokeniser platform to be transacted on the Redbelly Network. I think that's something which is going to be a great unlock for the network.

## 6. Project Acacia: fund units issued the moment you pay

- **File:** [`clips/06-acacia-instant-subscription.mp4`](clips/06-acacia-instant-subscription.mp4) (subtitles also as [`subtitles/06-acacia-instant-subscription.srt`](subtitles/06-acacia-instant-subscription.srt))
- **Source:** Redbelly Insights - Episode 26, 26 March 2026, [official episode file](https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/redbelly-website.firebasestorage.app/o/RBI_EP26.mp4?alt=media&token=ce10a8dd-1721-4272-bd43-f3e6be081d94)
- **Timestamps:** 19:52-20:16, 20:29-20:57
- **Speaker:** Matt Mills, Tokeniser (formerly Liquidise)
- **Topic:** Project Acacia / Tokeniser
- **Suggested post caption:** In Project Acacia, buying fund units went from a multi-day, paper-based process to an instant swap for AUDM stablecoin, visible on the Redbelly block explorer.

> So what Project Acacia coming back to the opportunity was, we could show, via Tokeniser, essentially, hey, a subscription goes from a multi-day, multi-step process that's paper-based where you essentially have to send the funds cash and hope and wait for the fund to eventually receive that cash, confirm that payment and then issue those units. And those units are issued normally on a spreadsheet. So with Acacia, what that meant was the investor could have AUDM stablecoin, agree to subscribe to the fund and purchase those units at a set price. And as soon as they agreed to that, immediately those funds and those units would swap. So essentially they, in real time, as soon as they made that payment, got those units issued to them and through the platform, they could see it, they could go down the block explorer, see that transaction. Fantastic. Instantaneous versus multi-day, multi-week.